World No.1 says players may unite for boycott if demands for fair revenue share are ignored, as tensions grow in tennis world.
World number one Aryna Sabalenka has sparked major debate in the tennis world after revealing she is open to boycotting Grand Slam tournaments in a bold push for a larger share of prize money.
Speaking at the Italian Open, Sabalenka delivered a strong message saying players are the “face of the sport” and without them there would be no tournaments, no entertainment, and no global spectacle.
She argued that players are not being paid a fair percentage of the massive revenues generated by Grand Slam events insisting that athletes deserve a significantly bigger share of the financial returns.
In a striking escalation Sabalenka warned that collective action, including a possible boycott, could eventually become unavoidable if negotiations continue to stall, suggesting that players may unite to fight for their rights.
Her comments come after top-ranked players last year formally challenged all four Grand Slam organisers, demanding higher prize money distribution, improved welfare support including retirement and maternity benefits, and a stronger role in decision-making processes.
The players reportedly pushed for a 22 percent share of tournament revenue, which would bring Grand Slams in line with the financial model used in leading ATP and WTA 1000 events.
However the proposal has exposed deep divisions within the sport. World number two Iga Swiatek rejected the idea of a boycott, calling it an “extreme” approach and stressing that constructive dialogue with governing bodies remains the better path forward.
Swiatek emphasized that meaningful negotiations should take place ahead of Roland Garros to address growing concerns around prize money distribution.
The controversy intensified further after players criticised the French Open’s recent announcement of a 9.5 percent prize money increase, describing it as inadequate.
They pointed out that while tournament revenues continue to rise sharply, the proportion allocated to players remains comparatively low, fueling frustration and raising the possibility of a wider confrontation in professional tennis.
