Trump says US not satisfied yet on deal with Iran

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday said that he was not yet satisfied ​on a deal with Iran, adding that the US ‌was not discussing easing sanctions on the country.

Speaking to reporters at a cabinet meeting at the White House, Trump said that ​Iran wants to make a deal.

“Iran is very ​much intent, they want very much to make a ⁠deal. So far they haven’t gotten there … we’re not ​satisfied with it, but we will be. We will ​be either that or we’ll have to just finish the job,” Trump said.

He added that under a potential framework deal with Tehran, the ​Strait of Hormuz would open immediately but that it ​would not be controlled by anybody.

“We’ll watch over it, but nobody’s ‌going ⁠to control it. That’s part of the negotiation that we have. They would like to control it. Nobody’s going to control it. It’s international waters and Oman will behave ​just like everybody ​else or ⁠we’ll have to blow them up,” Trump said.

The White House did not immediately respond ​to a request for comment on Trump’s comment ​on ⁠Oman. Oman’s embassy in Washington also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump also said that he was ⁠not ​comfortable with Russia or China taking ​Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

Oman will ‘behave,’ or will be attacked by US, Trump

Trump issued a stark threat to Oman on Wednesday, telling the Gulf country to “behave” or face attack from the US.

“Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up. They understand that. They’ll be fine,” the president said in remarks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House.

It is unclear what prompted Trump to make the charge against the Kingdom. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Oman previously served as a key mediator between the US and Iran, and reports have recently suggested that it is working with Iran to establish a toll system for ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, a key demand from Tehran amid negotiations to end the war the US and Israel started Feb. 28.

An Omani exclave sits on the southern tip of the strait, directly across the critical waterway from Iran.

Trump said the strait is “international waters, nobody’s going to control it,’ but maintained the US is “going to watch over it.”

“That’s part of the negotiation that we have. They would like to control it. Nobody’s going to control it,” he said.

Earlier, commenting on the state of the negotiations to end the war, Trump said he is “not satisfied with it, but we will be. Either that, or we’ll have to just finish the job.” Iran, he said, is “starting to give us the things that they have to give us.”

“Iran is very much intent, they want very much to make a deal, so far they haven’t gotten there,” he said. “They’re negotiating on fumes. We’ll see what happens. Maybe we have to go back and finish it. Maybe we don’t.”

Iranian draft

Iran’s state TV on Wednesday said Tehran had obtained a draft of an initial, unofficial framework for a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the United States on ending their conflict.

Under the framework, Iran would restore commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz to pre-war levels within a month, while the US would withdraw military forces from Iran’s vicinity and lift a naval blockade.

Earlier,State TV said the framework, which excludes military vessels and envisages Iran managing ship traffic through the strait in cooperation with Oman, was not yet finalised and that Tehran would take no steps without “tangible verification”.

It added that if a final agreement was reached within 60 days, it could be approved as a binding United Nations Security Council resolution.

However, the White House said on X: “This report from Iranian-controlled media is not true and the MOU they ‘released’ is a complete fabrication. Nobody should believe what Iranian state media is putting out. Facts matter.”

The emerging US-Iran MoU stems from indirect talks launched after the war that began in February, with Pakistan playing a central mediating role between Tehran and Washington.

The war erupted after a sharp escalation between Iran and Israel earlier this year, with both sides exchanging missile and drone attacks that disrupted shipping in the Gulf and drew in US military involvement, raising fears of a wider regional conflict.

Earlier, Deputy for Foreign Policy and International Security at Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Ali Bagheri Kani once again restated Tehran’s position that the fate of its highly enriched uranium was off limits in the current talks with the US, Al Jazeera reported on Wednesday.

“This issue is not on the agenda of the negotiations,” Kani told Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency on the sidelines of an international security conference in Moscow, according to Al Jazeera.

As per Fars, Kani had travelled on Wednesday to participate in the 14th International Meeting of High Representatives on Security, where he made the remarks in response to a question regarding the fate of Iran’s enriched uranium reserves.

Read: Iran demands release of $12b in frozen assets in potential deal with US

Kani’s comments, Fars wrote, came after Foreign Ministry Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei previously stated regarding the fate of 400 kilogrammes of 60% enriched uranium that “the nuclear issue is very clear — we are a member of the NPT and as a member, we have the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.”

The spokesman added, according to Fars, that Iran’s position on its high-enriched uranium stockpile was very clear, and that discussing details at this stage would not lead to results, as the two sides had previously tried that path and disagreements had been too significant to reach an outcome.

On Monday, US President Donald Trump said Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium would be either transferred to the US “immediately” to be destroyed or “destroyed in place, or at another acceptable location”.

Adversaries turning to hybrid warfare, says Iran’s Intelligence Ministry

Iran’s Intelligence Ministry said the enemy had been “defeated” on the battlefield and was now resorting to other means of warfare. The tactics, Al Jazeera wrote, included economic pressure, cyberattacks, weapons smuggling, assassinations and hostile media campaigns, the ministry alleged.

“The defeated enemy on the military front has now shifted its focus to soft war, cognitive warfare, and social provocations,” it said.

Read More: Iran’s top envoys discussing potential peace deal with Qatar prime minister, official says

In comments carried by Fars, the ministry warned Iranian authorities would “strictly prosecute” any espionage or “separatist activity”.

Iran says renewed war with US unlikely

Meanwhile, an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) official said a renewed war with the US was unlikely but warned that Iran stood ready to repel any attack, Iran’s semi-official Tasnim News Agency reported.

“The possibility of war is low because of the enemy’s weakness, but the armed forces are lying in wait,” said Mohammad Akbarzadeh, deputy political chief of the IRGC’s navy.

“Do not doubt we will turn the area from Chabahar to Mahshahr into a graveyard for aggressors,” he said, naming locations at each end of Iran’s lengthy southern coast, according to Al Jazeera, citing Tasnim.

South Korea says attack on ship in Strait of Hormuz likely involved Iranian missile

Separately, South Korea’s Foreign Ministry said that an attack on a cargo ship operated by a local shipper in the Strait of Hormuz earlier this month likely involved an Iranian anti-ship missile.

The Iranian embassy in Seoul did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The ministry made the assessment at a briefing to announce the outcome of a government investigation into the May 4 attack on the bulk carrier, which caused a fire and damaged the lower stern hull.

“Various pieces of evidence point toward Iran,” said First Vice Foreign Minister Park Yoon-joo, adding that Seoul had not conclusively determined who was responsible or whether the attack was intentional.

The probe looked at debris from unidentified objects that were found inside the ship after the attack on the vessel.

The analysis showed that the ship, named Namu, was attacked twice and while the first warhead did not explode, a second did. Components in the debris indicated the objects were likely made in Iran, the ministry said.

“Their engines were similar to turbojet engines made in Iran,” Park said, noting that one component had markings that appeared to be used by an Iranian manufacturer.

The warheads resembled those used in Iranian anti-ship missiles, the Noor or Qader, Park said.

Also Read: Pakistan plans oil reserves, storage push as Hormuz constraints expose vulnerabilities

South Korea will summon the Iranian ambassador to share the results of the investigation and deliver a protest message, he said. Seoul will also demand Iran take responsible measures to prevent a similar incident from recurring, Park added.

He declined to speculate on why a South Korean ship would have been targeted, saying Seoul could not determine intent without access to the attacker’s decision-making process.

A South Korean defence official said, however, that from a naval perspective, the firing of two missiles suggested an intention to cause damage.

Trump said ⁠soon ​after the incident that Iran had fired ​at the South Korean vessel, and urged Seoul to join US-led efforts to secure shipping through ​the strait.

Tehran has previously denied any responsibility for the attack.