Michael Jackson biopic records 26% Rotten Tomatoes score ahead of cinema release
Directed by Antoine Fuqua, ‘Michael’ stars Jaafar Jackson in his film debut as his uncle
The forthcoming Michael Jackson biopic has received a 26% critics score on Rotten Tomatoes based on 42 reviews, with early reactions raising concerns about its critical reception ahead of release.
The film, directed by Antoine Fuqua and starring Jaafar Jackson in his film debut as his uncle, is scheduled for theatrical release on April 24, with previews beginning on April 22 .
Despite initial expectations of strong awards contention, critics have widely challenged the film’s creative direction and storytelling approach.
Reviewers described the film as overly reverential, noting that its narrative concludes in the mid-1980s, omitting later periods of Jackson’s life.
BBC critic Nicholas Barber said it is “a saccharine, barely competent daytime TV movie”, while also arguing that the film removes dramatic tension by avoiding controversy.
Criticism has also focused on performances and character development. Jaafar Jackson’s portrayal has been described as reliant on physical resemblance rather than emotional depth, while supporting roles featuring Colman Domingo, Nia Long and Miles Teller were seen as underdeveloped.
Dialogue has been characterised by reviewers as lacking nuance.
According to Rolling Stone, the film’s recreation of Jackson’s performances and music videos fails to capture the originality associated with his work. Critics suggested that attempts to avoid contentious aspects of his life resulted in a portrayal that diminishes his artistic legacy.
Produced by Graham King and written by John Logan, the film reportedly had a budget of between $75 million and $90 million.
Despite the involvement of an experienced creative team, early reviews have led some commentators to question its commercial prospects, although audience turnout during opening weekend remains uncertain.
Additional commentary described the production as lacking narrative cohesion, while Variety noted it was “surprisingly effective middle-of-the-road”, reflecting mixed but largely critical reception.
