LatestPakistan

IHC issues notices to PIMS, Establishment Division and others on doctor’s petition


ISLAMABAD  –  The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has issued notices to PIMS, Establishment Division and others after a doctor from Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) approached the court seeking direction to the Central Selection Board (CSB) not to convene its meeting till a final decision on her departmental appeal. A single bench of IHC comprising Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan conducted hearing of a petition moved by Dr Majida Zafar through her counsel Tania Bazai challenging the upcoming CSB meeting.

The meeting of the CSB is scheduled to be held on Nov 25 to 27 to consider the promotion of senior officers to BS-20 and BS-21.  Petitioner’s counsel Tania Bazai contended that she had been discriminated against and deprived of the seniority through a tailer-made notification. She sought the court’s direction for her departmental appeal to be decided well before the CSB meeting in which the promotion of a panel forwarded by the hospital administration would be considered.  

The list forwarded by PIMS included the names of directors Najma Khursheed, Sadia Aftab and deputy director Nousheen Amjad. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court to issue direction to the CSB not to convene its meeting till a final decision on her departmental appeal.  Dr Majida asserted that she should be considered for promotion in the said meeting. She stated the respondents namely Najma Khursheed, Sadia Aftab and Nousheen Amjad, non-clinical doctors, were brought to PIMS from another service cadre and placed in the petitioner’s cadre which under the applicable legal framework could not have been done.

Her counsel Advocate Bazai contended that as a consequence of this unlawful absorption in a different cadre, the seniority list had also been affected to the prejudice of her client.  According to the petition, these respondents belonged to the administrative cadre and lacked the requisite experience for promotion to the post of associate professor of gynecology as they had never served as an assistant professor of gynecology which was a prerequisite for the subject promotion. 

Furthermore, they have also never held the posts of senior registrar or medical officer in any tertiary care hospital, which was also essential for promotion to the post of assistant professor. The counsel said that Sadia Aftab was an assistant instructor at Population Ministry and was transferred to PIMS and managed to change her cadre to the clinical cadre. Bazai added Sadia claimed backdated seniority based on her previous position. This action implied the conversion of job experience from one cadre to another, which is against established norms and regulations. 

The counsel further said that Nosheen Amjad and Najma Khursheed got changed their administrative cadres from administrative/ non-teaching doctor to clinical cadre upon their deputation to PIMS.  The petition stated that the respondents also got promotions in BS 18 and 19 without departmental selection board and departmental promotion committee’s recommendations. After hearing the preliminary arguments, the IHC bench issued notices to PIMS, Establishment Division and other respondents and sought their reply till November 7.




Crafting High-Ranking Web with SEO Expertise.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button